The Government of Manipur has significantly expanded policing powers under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, even as protests and a statewide shutdown continue to disrupt daily life across several districts.
According to a Home Department notification issued on April 22, the Administrative Secretary (Home) has been designated as the “Designated Authority” under Section 43A of the Act. The order authorises all police personnel not below the rank of Head Constable or Havildar—across both civil and armed forces—to carry out arrests, searches, and seizures with immediate effect.
Officials empowered under the directive can act if they have “reason to believe” that an offence linked to unlawful or anti-national activities has been or may be committed. The notification also allows searches of buildings, vehicles, and premises at any time, including at night, and permits seizure of documents or property considered relevant to investigations.
Authorities stated that the move is aimed at strengthening enforcement and improving operational response amid ongoing security concerns. The order will remain in force until further notice and has been circulated to key administrative offices, including the Governor’s Secretariat, Chief Secretary, and Director General of Police.
Meanwhile, tensions remain high on the ground. A sit-in protest was staged in Imphal by members of Apunba Chingmeirong, who raised concerns over recent violence and demanded strong action against alleged militant groups. Protesters also called for justice for victims, including children, and accountability in cases involving security forces.
At the same time, a five-day total shutdown called in protest against the Tronglaobi bomb attack entered its fourth day, severely affecting normal life. Markets, schools, and transportation services remained largely shut, with deserted roads reported across affected areas.
However, limited activity was seen at Khwairamband Ima Market, where a small number of women vendors resumed selling essential goods due to economic compulsions. Many vendors expressed support for the protest but said prolonged disruptions had made it difficult to sustain their livelihoods.
Some traders described the situation as a struggle between economic survival and solidarity with the movement. A vendor, Anita, said she was compelled to reopen her stall despite backing the protest, citing daily financial needs.
Protest activities, including rallies and demonstrations, continued in several parts of the state, while security forces remained deployed in sensitive areas to prevent further escalation.
